SEASONED PROFESSIONAL BARTENDERS often express frustration over the lack of skill of new hires who also exhibit little desire to learn or accept guidance. This post is in follow up to my last one on the expertise gap between bartenders, but also points out a few reasons why “amateur” may not be the correct word to describe new hires who neither seem to particularly enjoy bartending, nor display any particular passion for it – and yet, they are compensated at the same rate as someone more highly skilled, better trained, fully dedicated, while at the same time not being held to the same standards.



This post attempts to delve into the question of “Skill Levels: Amateur vs. Professional” to help create a mechanism for coping with and methodically improving situations at work. This post, combined with my previous one, should provide some helpful guidelines and a path forward.



What follows is purposefully written NOT to focus ONLY on bartenders, but to paint a broader picture meant to point out what a normal diagnosis and potential cures looks like across a broader spectrum of fields. Hopefully everyone involved (you, the owner, guests, co-workers etc) will benefit from something you read here.



QUESTION:
What is the difference between an amateur and a professional?



ANSWER:
The difference between an amateur and a professional generally lies in skill level, commitment, and often the financial aspect of their pursuits.

AmateursĀ engage in an activity primarily for enjoyment and passion rather than for financial gain. They may have other full-time occupations and usually do not receive significant payment for their activities. While amateurs can be highly skilled, they often have less formal training and fewer opportunities to hone their skills in a competitive or rigorous environment compared to professionals.

Professionals, on the other hand, are typically engaged in their pursuits as a full-time occupation and receive monetary compensation. They often have formal training and a higher level of expertise in their field. Professionals are also expected to adhere to higher standards of conduct and performance, as their livelihood depends on the quality of their work.

The distinction isn’t just about the level of skill, but also the commitment to the activity as a source of livelihood and the dedication to continuously improve within that realm.



QUESTION:
Are professionals paid more than amateurs?



ANSWER:
Yes, typically professionals are paid more than amateurs. This is primarily because professionals have turned their skills into a livelihood, often investing in extensive training and dedicating significant time to mastering their field. This level of expertise, along with the responsibility and consistency required in a professional role, usually commands higher financial compensation.



Amateurs, on the other hand, engage in activities more for personal enjoyment or passion and less for financial gain. They may receive some remuneration or none at all, depending on the context of their activity. For example, in sports, amateur athletes might compete in local leagues where no or little money is involved, while professional athletes compete in leagues where salaries and endorsements can be substantial.



QUESTION:
How much greater is the rate of compensation of professionals over amateurs?



ANSWER:
The rate of compensation for professionals compared to amateurs can vary widely based on the field, level of expertise, market demand, and geographic location. In general, professionals can earn significantly more than amateurs because their income is tied directly to their work in that field, while amateurs might not be compensated at all or only receive nominal amounts. Here are a few examples to illustrate the differences:

  1. Sports: Professional athletes can earn salaries that range from thousands to millions of dollars annually, depending on the sport and level of competition. This is in stark contrast to amateur athletes, who might only receive compensation in the form of small stipends, reimbursements for expenses, or no money at all.
  2. Arts: In fields like music or painting, professionals who have established a market for their work can earn substantial incomes through sales, commissions, and performances. Amateurs, however, often do not earn money from their art and might even incur costs for supplies and classes without any expectation of financial return.
  3. Science and Academia: Professional scientists and academics are typically salaried employees of institutions like universities, research labs, or corporations. In contrast, amateur scientists may engage in research out of personal interest without any financial compensation.
  4. Technology: Professional software developers, for instance, are compensated with salaries, benefits, and sometimes stock options or bonuses, depending on their role and the company’s policies. Hobbyist developers might create software in their spare time for personal satisfaction, contributing to open-source projects without direct payment.

The exact multiple by which professionals out-earn amateurs depends on many factors, but it can be substantial, especially in fields where professional status is associated with high-paying opportunities and endorsements.



QUESTION:
What is the best route for a professional to take when working with unenthusiastic amateurs who fail to take guidance?



ANSWER:
When a professional encounters unenthusiastic amateurs who are resistant to guidance, navigating the situation carefully can help improve outcomes and collaboration. Here are some strategies that might be effective:

  1. Establish Clear Objectives: Start by clarifying the goals and expectations of the project or task at hand. Make sure everyone understands the purpose and the benefits of achieving the objectives. Clear goals can sometimes motivate reluctant participants.
  2. Foster a Collaborative Environment: Encourage an inclusive atmosphere where all participants feel valued and understood. This can involve more listening than directing. Ask for input from the amateurs to make them feel involved and respected, which can increase their buy-in and enthusiasm.
  3. Adapt Communication Styles: Recognize that amateurs might not be familiar with industry jargon or professional norms. Use clear, simple language and provide context to make guidance more accessible and relevant.
  4. Provide Training and Resources: Sometimes lack of enthusiasm stems from feeling overwhelmed or incompetent. Offering training sessions or resources can empower the amateurs and reduce their anxiety about the tasks at hand.
  5. Lead by Example: Show your commitment and enthusiasm for the work. Professional demeanor and passion can be contagious; demonstrating your investment in the project might inspire others to match your energy.
  6. Set Up Incremental Goals: Break down tasks into smaller, manageable parts with achievable milestones. Celebrating these smaller successes can boost morale and engagement.
  7. Give Constructive Feedback: Provide feedback in a way that is helpful and encouraging rather than critical. Highlight what is going well, and suggest improvements in a supportive manner.
  8. Understand Their Motivations: Engage in discussions to understand why the amateurs might be unenthusiastic. Addressing their specific concerns or motivations can help align their interests with the project goals.
  9. Reassess Involvement: If all else fails, it might be necessary to reassess the participation of the amateurs. If their involvement is crucial, consider different roles that might better suit their interests and skills.

By implementing these approaches, a professional can better manage a group of unenthusiastic amateurs, potentially transforming their attitude and improving the overall dynamic and outcomes of the project.



QUESTION:
Does this advice apply to situations where the amateurs receive payment equal to the professionals, but the amateurs are only there for the money?



ANSWER:
Yes, the advice can still apply, but with some adjustments to acknowledge the unique dynamics of the situation. When amateurs are compensated at the same level as professionals but are only motivated by the money, the challenge becomes motivating them beyond the financial incentive to engage meaningfully in the work. Here are some tailored strategies that might help:

  1. Highlight the Impact of Their Work: Emphasize how their contributions fit into the bigger picture and the positive impact they can make. Understanding the value of their work might inspire a deeper commitment beyond just receiving a paycheck.
  2. Establish Professional Standards: Set clear expectations about the quality and commitment expected, regardless of motivation. Sometimes, establishing high standards can push individuals to engage more deeply with their tasks to meet those expectations.
  3. Create a Sense of Ownership and Responsibility: Encourage amateurs to take ownership of their tasks or projects. When people feel personally responsible for the outcomes of their work, they are more likely to put in effort and care about the results.
  4. Incentivize Performance: Since financial gain is a primary motivator, consider structuring additional performance-based incentives. These could be tied to quality, efficiency, or creative contributions, providing extra motivation to exceed basic requirements.
  5. Foster Peer Accountability: Encourage a team environment where peers motivate and hold each other accountable. Sometimes, social pressure and the desire to be respected by peers can enhance motivation.
  6. Offer Professional Development: Provide opportunities for growth and advancement. Showing amateurs that there is a potential career path or additional skills to be gained can encourage a longer-term perspective beyond immediate financial rewards.
  7. Personalize Engagement Strategies: Understand what personally motivates each team member, even if it’s outside traditional professional motivations. Tailoring your engagement strategies can make them more effective.
  8. Review and Feedback Loops: Regularly review their work and provide constructive feedback. Make sure to acknowledge improvements and efforts to align better with professional standards.
  9. Discuss Future Opportunities: Highlight how developing their skills and improving their performance could lead to future opportunities, either within the same role or in more advanced roles. This might help shift their focus from short-term financial gain to long-term benefits.

These strategies aim to cultivate a more intrinsic motivation and a professional attitude, even if the initial draw was purely financial. By addressing their broader interests and integrating them more deeply into the team’s culture and goals, you can potentially enhance their engagement and contribution.



A QUICK OVERVIEW OF WHAT WAS JUST COVERED:



When working with amateurs who are compensated equally to professionals but are primarily motivated by money, the challenge lies in engaging them beyond just the paycheck. To address this, you can:

  1. Emphasize the broader impact of their workĀ to inspire a deeper connection to the project.
  2. Set clear professional standardsĀ to ensure they understand the expected quality and commitment.
  3. Encourage ownership and responsibilityĀ for their tasks, which can increase their commitment.
  4. Implement performance-based incentivesĀ to motivate them to exceed basic expectations.
  5. Utilize peer accountabilityĀ where team dynamics help enhance motivation.
  6. Offer professional development opportunitiesĀ to show potential for growth and career advancement.
  7. Customize engagement tacticsĀ based on individual motivations, which can be more effective.
  8. Conduct regular reviews and provide feedback, acknowledging improvements to foster a professional attitude.
  9. Discuss future opportunitiesĀ that could arise from enhanced performance and commitment, shifting focus from immediate financial rewards to long-term benefits.

These strategies are designed to foster intrinsic motivation and professionalism, helping to integrate amateurs more effectively into teams and projects despite their initial financial motivations.



IN SUMMARY:



In this conversation, we discussed the differences between amateurs and professionals, focusing on skill levels, commitment, and compensation. Professionals typically earn more due to their expertise and the financial structure of their careers, whereas amateurs often participate for passion without expecting significant financial return.



When professionals work with unenthusiastic amateurs, especially those who might be in it just for the money, the approach should be thoughtful. Key strategies include clarifying objectives, fostering a collaborative environment, adapting communication styles, and providing incremental goals and constructive feedback. For amateurs paid similarly to professionals but motivated solely by financial gains, it’s beneficial to emphasize the impact of their work, set clear professional standards, and possibly use performance-based incentives. Developing a sense of ownership and responsibility in their roles, fostering peer accountability, and offering professional development opportunities can also help deepen their engagement.



Overall, the goal is to enhance motivation beyond financial incentives, integrating amateurs more fully into the team and aligning their efforts with broader project objectives.

0 comments

QUESTION:
Is a newer, untrained low or mid-skilled bartender considered to be a peer of a senior advanced skills bartender?

ANSWER:
A newer, untrained low or mid-skilled bartender would not typically be considered a peer of a senior advanced skills bartender in terms of experience and expertise within their field. The term “peer” usually refers to individuals who share similar levels of experience and knowledge. In this case, the low or mid-skilled bartender is likely at the beginning of their career, still acquiring skills and knowledge, while the advanced skills bartender has decades of experience and has likely achieved a high level of expertise. However, they can still share a professional relationship and work collaboratively, with the novice benefiting from the master’s guidance and experience.

QUESTION:
What would be an appropriate way for the advanced skills bartender to relate to the low or mid-skilled bartender that their actions are disrupting the work of the advanced skills bartender?

ANSWER:
The advanced skills bartender can address the situation effectively and constructively by using clear, respectful communication. Hereā€™s a suitable approach:

  1. Choose an Appropriate Time and Setting: Find a private moment to talk, ensuring the conversation is discreet and doesn’t embarrass the novice in front of others.
  2. Use “I” Statements: Start the conversation with “I” statements to express how the novice’s actions affect the master’s work. For example, “I’ve noticed that some of the procedures you’ve been using have been impacting the workflow on my projects.”
  3. Be Specific and Objective: Clearly describe specific instances or actions that are causing disruption. This helps avoid making the novice feel criticized without basis.
  4. Offer Guidance: Instead of merely pointing out what is wrong, the master should offer constructive feedback and guidance on how to improve. For instance, “Perhaps we could go over the standard procedures together, so we’re more aligned on how tasks should be handled.”
  5. Encourage Open Communication: Let the novice know they can ask questions or seek help if they’re unsure about a task. “Feel free to ask me if you’re unsure about anything. I’m here to help.”
  6. Listen: Give the novice a chance to speak. They might have valid reasons or explanations for their actions that the master should consider.
  7. End Positively: Conclude on a positive note, emphasizing the goal of working effectively together. “I know you’re still learning, and I’m impressed by [specific positive trait or action]. Letā€™s keep working on syncing our methods.”


By handling the situation this way, the advanced skills bartender can help foster a supportive and productive work environment.

QUESTION:
What should the advanced skills bartender do if the low or mid-skilled bartender refuses to take advice or heed the correction of the advanced skills bartender?

ANSWER:
If the low or mid-skilled bartender refuses to take advice or heed corrections, the advanced skills bartender should take additional steps to address the situation while maintaining professionalism and support. Here’s a suggested approach:

  1. Re-evaluate Communication: Assess whether the initial feedback was clear and delivered in an understandable way. Consider if there might be a better way to communicate that could be more effective.
  2. Schedule a Follow-Up Meeting: Arrange another meeting to reiterate the concerns and clarify the importance of following established procedures and accepting guidance. This time, more explicitly outline the potential consequences of not adapting behaviors, such as impacts on safety, quality, and team efficiency.
  3. Express Consequences: Clearly communicate the consequences of continued non-compliance, which might include formal warnings, reassignment, or further disciplinary action depending on company policy.
  4. Involve a Supervisor or HR: If the behavior doesn’t change after repeated attempts to address it directly, it may be necessary to involve a supervisor or the human resources department. They can provide additional support and enforce workplace policies.
  5. Document Interactions: Keep detailed records of all interactions, feedback given, and the responses received. This documentation can be useful for escalating the issue to higher management or HR and serves as a record in case of disputes.
  6. Offer Mentorship or Additional Training: Sometimes, resistance can stem from feeling overwhelmed or under-skilled. Offering additional training or mentorship might help the novice feel more competent and secure in their role.
  7. Set Clear Expectations: Ensure that all expectations and role responsibilities are clearly defined. This can help eliminate any confusion and make it easier to hold the novice accountable.
  8. Be Patient and Persistent: Sometimes, change takes time, and repeated, consistent messaging can eventually lead to improvements.


By following these steps, the advanced skills bartender can help foster a more productive work environment and either facilitate improvement in the low or mid-skilled bartenderā€™s performance or take appropriate action if improvement does not occur.

QUESTION:
What should the advanced skills bartender do when the low or mid-skilled bartender fails to accept instruction, and supervisors are notified but refuse to take action?

ANSWER:
When a low or mid-skilled bartender fails to accept instruction and supervisors are notified but refuse to take action, the advanced skills bartender can consider several further steps to address the situation effectively:

  1. Document Everything: Continue to document all instances of the low or mid-skilled bartenderā€™s behavior, the impact on work, any attempts at correction, and the lack of action from supervisors. Detailed records can be vital for escalating the issue further if needed.
  2. Seek a Meeting with Higher Management: If immediate supervisors are unresponsive, it may be appropriate to request a meeting with higher-level management. Prepare a clear presentation of the issues, supported by documentation, to explain how the noviceā€™s behavior is impacting the workplace and productivity.
  3. Consult Human Resources (HR): Involving HR can provide a formal avenue for addressing the issue. HR departments are equipped to handle such conflicts and can offer mediation or formal disciplinary processes that supervisors might be overlooking.
  4. Explore Mediation: If the workplace has a mediation process or if HR can facilitate such a discussion, it might help to have a neutral third party listen to the concerns of both the advanced skills bartender and the low or mid-skilled bartender. This can sometimes resolve misunderstandings and open up better lines of communication.
  5. Adjust Work Assignments: If possible, the advanced skills bartender might consider adjusting work assignments to minimize the disruptive impact of the low or mid-skilled bartender on critical tasks, at least temporarily while seeking a resolution.
  6. Professional Development and Training: Suggest (or if possible, arrange) professional development or conflict resolution training for the team. Sometimes broader training can help address personal conflicts and improve team dynamics.
  7. Legal or Ethical Considerations: If the situation involves violations of workplace regulations, safety standards, or ethical codes, bringing these aspects to the attention of relevant authorities or compliance departments within the company can prompt action.
  8. Consider Personal Strategies: Finally, if all organizational channels fail, the advanced skills bartender might need to develop personal coping strategies to manage the stress and frustration resulting from the situation, possibly even reevaluating their own position within the team or company if the environment becomes untenable.


By taking these steps, the advanced skills bartender can ensure that they have done everything within their power to resolve the situation responsibly, while also safeguarding their own professional interests.

0 comments
In the past, most NYC bars used a mix known as “SLJ,” which originally stood for “Sweetened Lemon Juice” and comprised a blend of lemon juice, lime juice, and sugar.



This mixture predates prohibition and often included additional agents like frothers, as described by David Wondrich in “Imbibe.” He mentioned an early 20th-century concoction involving acid and egg whites sold by the gallon.



Cheryl Charming, in her book “Bartending Basics,” also discusses making a versatile sour mix from equal parts lemon and lime juice, useful for many tropical cocktails.



Today, “SLJ” frequently refers to “Sweetened Lime Juice,” such as Rose’s Lime Juice, but historically, it meant something slightly different. When mixing drinks, it’s crucial to balance sour and sweet components. For instance, if a recipe calls for 1 oz of SLJ and includes sweet liqueurs, you might use 3/4 oz lime juice and 1/4 oz simple syrup to achieve the right balance. Without additional sweeteners, a balanced mix might be equal parts lime or lemon juice and simple syrup.



Modern bars may still use pre-made mixes, but understanding how to adjust the balance of ingredients yourself can enhance your cocktail crafting. For drinks like Margaritas and Mojitos, use sweetened lime juice; for Sours and Collins’, opt for sweetened lemon juice. Always taste your cocktails after mixing to ensure they’re well-balanced.



I plan to eventually update the references to SLJ across over 700 pages on this site, providing clear guidance and linking back to this explanation to help users understand and utilize this ingredient effectively.



Thanks for reading, and happy mixing!
0 comments

BROOKLYN

Glass: Chilled Cocktail
Method: Stir & strain


INGREDIENTS:
1 oz Jameson or John Powers Whiskey
1 oz Dry Vermouth
Ā½ Barspoon (2Ā½ ml) Maraschino Liqueur
Ā½ Barspoon (2Ā½ ml) Amer Picon (or Amaro as Amer Picon is hard to find everywhere).


Garnish: Lemon Twist

0 comments

An article I saw on LinkedIn, published by INC. It categorizes workers into six types, and understanding the types better is supposed to (I’m guessing) give businesses an edge in retaining employees post pandemic shut-down to survive and somehow better strategize how to slow all of the employee resignations.

Me: “TEAM – There is no ‘I’ in TEAM!”

Apparently, through research, six types of worker are showing up, and only three types have anything to do with “team”:

OPERATORS,

GIVERS, and 

STRIVERS.



There are also ARTISANS but they’re more like cats – herding them is, well, no mention of team there at all, right? So I think not.

The study almost seems to suggest that you can’t expect much from these team players.

One of two types emphasizing “team” is the OPERATOR:

OPERATORS

The operator is the traditional work-to-live type, the reports says “operators find meaning and self-worth primarily outside of their jobs.

Operators are one of the more team-minded archetypes, and often see many of their colleagues as friends.”

Strengths: team players. Weaknesses: not proactive, easily disengaged.Ā 



One of the other two types that mention team is the “GIVERS” (somewhat good for teams) – …Their empathetic nature typically translates into a strong team spirit and deep personal relationships at work. …


GIVERS

The Givers’ Strengths: selfless, help build trust within an organization. Weaknesses: sometimes impractical or naive.”


The second of the two “Team” groups are the STRIVERS – these guys are what, by most corporate management measures, represents themselves. In fact though, NOT good team players. šŸ™‚ Most interesting!āø


STRIVERS

“Strivers have a strong desire to make something of themselves. They are motivated by professional success, and value status and compensation….

Strengths: disciplined and transparent. Weaknesses: their competitiveness can degrade trust and camaraderie within teams.”



If I had to classify myself I’d say, probably, Giver, Artisan, Striver. I want to do great beautiful things, and learn them, and do them the best and share them while helping others to reach their limits too – but want nothing to do with slowing down, doing less, reducing standards, or “becoming one of the guys” if that means not being on fire every day. I’m happy to coach, encourage, and train others – or learn from anyone who’s stronger in areas I can improve in.

END

0 comments